0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.12	% Command    : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6pivNxrXlO true
0.11/0.33	% Computer   : n031.cluster.edu
0.11/0.33	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.33	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.33	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.11/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.11/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 16:21:44 EDT 2021
0.11/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.11/0.33	% Running portfolio for 120 s
0.11/0.33	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.11/0.33	% Number of cores: 8
0.11/0.33	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.11/0.33	% Running in HO mode
0.47/0.61	% Total configuration time : 828
0.47/0.61	% Estimated wc time : 983
0.47/0.61	% Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 122.875
0.49/0.70	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 47s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 47s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 18s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 53s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 41s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 47s
0.49/0.71	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 24s
0.52/0.72	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 35s
17.94/2.90	% Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh.
17.94/2.90	% running E: timeout 11 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/eprover-ho --pos-ext=all --neg-ext=all /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.6pivNxrXlO/e_input1d9305 --cpu-limit=9 --auto-schedule -s -p
17.94/2.90	% done 88 iterations in 2.144s
17.94/2.90	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
17.94/2.90	% SZS output start Refutation
17.94/2.90	thf(transitive_type, type, transitive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(mnot_type, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(reflexive_type, type, reflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(mvalid_type, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(mbox_type, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(mimpl_type, type, mimpl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(mor_type, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
17.94/2.90	thf(transitive, axiom,(( transitive  ) =
17.94/2.90	  (^[R:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	   ( ![X:$i,Y:$i,Z:$i]:
17.94/2.90	     ( ( ( R @ X @ Y ) & ( R @ Y @ Z ) ) => ( R @ X @ Z ) ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('0', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( transitive ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ![X:$i,Y:$i,Z:$i]:
17.94/2.90	         ( ( ( R @ X @ Y ) & ( R @ Y @ Z ) ) => ( R @ X @ Z ) ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [transitive])).
17.94/2.90	thf('1', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( transitive ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ![X4:$i,X6:$i,X8:$i]:
17.94/2.90	         ( ( ( V_1 @ X4 @ X6 ) & ( V_1 @ X6 @ X8 ) ) => ( V_1 @ X4 @ X8 ) ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(reflexive, axiom,(( reflexive  ) =
17.94/2.90	  (^[R:( $i > $i > $o )]: ( ![X:$i]: ( R @ X @ X ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('2', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( reflexive ) = ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o )]: ( ![X:$i]: ( R @ X @ X ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [reflexive])).
17.94/2.90	thf('3', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( reflexive ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 @ X4 ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(mvalid, axiom,(( mvalid  ) = (^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( P @ W ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('4', plain, (( mvalid ) = ( ^[P:( $i > $o )]: ( ![W:$i]: ( P @ W ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mvalid])).
17.94/2.90	thf('5', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mvalid ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o )]: ( ![X4:$i]: ( V_1 @ X4 ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(mbox, axiom,(( mbox  ) =
17.94/2.90	  (^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),P:( $i > $o ),X:$i]:
17.94/2.90	   ( ![Y:$i]: ( ( R @ X @ Y ) => ( P @ Y ) ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('6', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mbox ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[R:( $i > $i > $o ),P:( $i > $o ),X:$i]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ![Y:$i]: ( ( R @ X @ Y ) => ( P @ Y ) ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mbox])).
17.94/2.90	thf('7', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mbox ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ![X4:$i]: ( ( V_1 @ V_3 @ X4 ) => ( V_2 @ X4 ) ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(mimpl, axiom,(( mimpl  ) =
17.94/2.90	  (^[U:( $i > $o ),V:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ U ) @ V )))).
17.94/2.90	thf(mor, axiom,(( mor  ) =
17.94/2.90	  (^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('8', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mor ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) | ( Y @ U ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mor])).
17.94/2.90	thf('9', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mor ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) | ( V_2 @ V_3 ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(mnot, axiom,(( mnot  ) = (^[X:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ~( X @ U ) )))).
17.94/2.90	thf('10', plain, (( mnot ) = ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),U:$i]: ( ~( X @ U ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mnot])).
17.94/2.90	thf('11', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mnot ) = ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:$i]: ( ~( V_1 @ V_2 ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf('12', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mimpl ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[U:( $i > $o ),V:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ U ) @ V ) )),
17.94/2.90	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [mimpl, '9', '11'])).
17.94/2.90	thf('13', plain,
17.94/2.90	    (( mimpl ) =
17.94/2.90	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o )]: ( mor @ ( mnot @ V_1 ) @ V_2 ) )),
17.94/2.90	    define([status(thm)])).
17.94/2.90	thf(thm, conjecture,
17.94/2.90	  (![R:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	   ( ( ![A:( $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ( mvalid @ ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ R @ A ) @ A ) ) & 
17.94/2.90	         ( mvalid @
17.94/2.90	           ( mimpl @ ( mbox @ R @ A ) @ ( mbox @ R @ ( mbox @ R @ A ) ) ) ) ) ) <=>
17.94/2.90	     ( ( reflexive @ R ) & ( transitive @ R ) ) ))).
17.94/2.90	thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture,
17.94/2.90	  (![X4:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	   ( ( ![X6:( $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	       ( ( ![X12:$i]:
17.94/2.90	           ( ( ![X16:$i]:
17.94/2.90	               ( ( X4 @ X12 @ X16 ) =>
17.94/2.90	                 ( ![X18:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X16 @ X18 ) => ( X6 @ X18 ) ) ) ) ) | 
17.94/2.90	             ( ~( ![X14:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X12 @ X14 ) => ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ) ) ) & 
17.94/2.90	         ( ![X8:$i]:
17.94/2.90	           ( ( X6 @ X8 ) | 
17.94/2.90	             ( ~( ![X10:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( X6 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) <=>
17.94/2.90	     ( ( ![X22:$i,X24:$i,X26:$i]:
17.94/2.90	         ( ( ( X4 @ X24 @ X26 ) & ( X4 @ X22 @ X24 ) ) => ( X4 @ X22 @ X26 ) ) ) & 
17.94/2.90	       ( ![X20:$i]: ( X4 @ X20 @ X20 ) ) ) ))).
17.94/2.90	thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
17.94/2.90	  (~( ![X4:( $i > $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	      ( ( ![X6:( $i > $o )]:
17.94/2.90	          ( ( ![X12:$i]:
17.94/2.90	              ( ( ![X16:$i]:
17.94/2.90	                  ( ( X4 @ X12 @ X16 ) =>
17.94/2.90	                    ( ![X18:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X16 @ X18 ) => ( X6 @ X18 ) ) ) ) ) | 
17.94/2.90	                ( ~( ![X14:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X12 @ X14 ) => ( X6 @ X14 ) ) ) ) ) ) & 
17.94/2.90	            ( ![X8:$i]:
17.94/2.90	              ( ( X6 @ X8 ) | 
17.94/2.90	                ( ~( ![X10:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( X6 @ X10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) <=>
17.94/2.90	        ( ( ![X22:$i,X24:$i,X26:$i]:
17.94/2.90	            ( ( ( X4 @ X24 @ X26 ) & ( X4 @ X22 @ X24 ) ) =>
17.94/2.90	              ( X4 @ X22 @ X26 ) ) ) & 
17.94/2.90	          ( ![X20:$i]: ( X4 @ X20 @ X20 ) ) ) ) )),
17.94/2.90	  inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
17.94/2.90	thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
17.94/2.90	    (~ (((!!) @ (^[Y0 : $i > $i > $o]:
17.94/2.90	                   (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i > $o]:
17.94/2.90	                                 (((((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                               (((((!!) @ (^[Y3 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                                             (((Y0 @ Y2 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                               Y3) =>
17.94/2.90	                                                               (((!!) @ (
17.94/2.90	                                                                 ^[Y4 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                                                   ((
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y0 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y3 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y4) =>
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y1 @ Y4))))))))))) |
17.94/2.90	                                                 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                                                    ((
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y0 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y2 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y3) =>
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y1 @ Y3))))))))))))) &
17.94/2.90	                                   (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                               (((Y1 @ Y2) |
17.94/2.90	                                                 (((~) @ (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                                                    ((
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y0 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y2 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                                    Y3) =>
17.94/2.90	                                                                    (Y1 @ Y3)))))))))))))))))) <=>
17.94/2.90	                     (((((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                   (((!!) @ (^[Y2 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                               (((!!) @ (^[Y3 : $i]:
17.94/2.90	                                                           (((((Y0 @ Y2 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                               Y3) & (Y0 @ 
17.94/2.90	                                                               Y1 @ Y2))) =>
17.94/2.90	                                                             (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y3)))))))))))) &
17.94/2.90	                       (((!!) @ (^[Y1 : $i]: (Y0 @ Y1 @ Y1)))))))))))),
17.94/2.90	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
17.94/2.90	thf(zip_derived_cl1278, plain, ($false),
17.94/2.90	    inference('eprover', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0])).
17.94/2.90	
17.94/2.90	% SZS output end Refutation
17.94/2.90	
17.94/2.90	
17.94/2.90	% Terminating...
18.66/2.97	% Runner terminated.
18.66/2.98	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
18.66/2.98	EOF